“1947年8月27日，刘邓大军千里跃进大别山后......野司警卫团的一位副连长未经店主同意，拿了店里的一捆粉条和一匹花布。邓小平为了严肃军纪，召开公判大会，按约法三章，枪毙了这个副连长。这件事在全军和群众中引起了震动，从此，部队纪律严明，秋毫无犯。”

好一个“秋毫无犯”！看了这则历史故事，疑问多多：（1）1927年大张旗鼓搞“打土豪分田地”的，不也是这支军队吗？这是“秋毫无犯”吗？（2）1950年代立法将全国所有的土地充公，历史性地剥夺全体国民的土地所有权，不也是这支军队吗？这是“秋毫无犯”吗？（3）1950年代将全国所有大小企业主的全部资产充公，不也是这支军队吗？这是“秋毫无犯”吗？

历史事实就是：就是这支“秋毫无犯”的军队，把整个国家全体国民的私有财产，以国有的名义剥夺占有！

"On August 27, 1947, after the Liu-Deng army made a long march to the Dabie Mountains... a deputy company commander of the Wild Regiment Security Guard took a bundle of noodles and a piece of floral cloth from a shop without the shopkeeper's consent. In order to enforce military discipline, Deng Xiaoping held a public trial and, in accordance with the three articles of military law, executed the deputy company commander. This event caused a shock among the whole army and the public, and since then, military discipline had been strictly enforced and no one dared to violate it, not harming a new feather of the public." (ZT)

What a "not harming a new feather of the public". After reading this historical story, there are many questions that arise. First, wasn't the same army also involved in the "land reform" campaign to "seize land from the landlords" in 1927? Was this "not harming a new feather of the public"? Second, wasn't it the same army that legislated in the 1950s to confiscate all the land in the country and historically deprive all the people of their land ownership? Was this "not harming a new feather of the public"? Third, wasn't it the same army that confiscated all the assets of all business owners of all sizes in the 1950s? Was this "not harming a new feather of the public"?

The historical fact is that this "not harming a new feather of the public" army, in the name of state ownership, deprived all the private property of the entire country's citizens!

中西历史十大差异

1. 活人殉葬：中国长期大规模存在，西方从未有过。《汉书》记载秦始皇陵杀殉数万人。活人殉葬直至1928年才由南京国民政府彻底终止。
2. 人吃人：中国长期大规模存在，史不绝书，历朝各代皆有，直至20世纪60年代文革期间。西方少量存在。
3. 太监制度：中国长期大规模存在，西方早期零星存在。
4. 后宫制度：中国长期存在，西方从未有过。
5. 一夫多妻制：中国长期大规模存在，西方早期零星存在。
6. 帝王陵墓：不论陵墓规模还是陪葬品，中国远超西方。一座秦始皇陵，远超欧洲诸国所有帝王陵墓之总和。
7. 杀俘屠城：中国长期大规模存在，史不绝书，历朝各代皆有。西方零星存在。
8. 骨肉相残：中国长期大规模存在，史不绝书，历朝各代皆有。西方零星存在。
9. 株连九族：中国长期大规模存在，史不绝书，历朝各代皆有。西方从未有过。
10. 杀婴：中国长期大规模存在，直至今日。西方少量存在。

Comparisons of Chinese and Western History: Ten Major Differences:

1. Burial with the Dead: This practice existed on a large scale in China for thousands of years but was never present in the West. The Book of Han records that tens of thousands of people were killed and buried in the mausoleum of Emperor Qin Shi Huang. The practice of burying the living with the dead was not completely abolished until 1928 by the Nanjing Nationalist government.
2. Cannibalism: This practice existed on a large scale in China for thousands of years, as documented in the historical records of all dynasties, until the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s. Cannibalism in the West was infrequent.
3. Eunuch System: This practice existed on a large scale in China for thousands of years, while in the West, it existed only infrequently in the early times.
4. Imperial Harem System: This system existed for thousands of years in China but never in the West.
5. Polygamy: This practice existed on a large scale in China for thousands of years, while in the West, it existed only infrequently in the early times.
6. Imperial Mausoleum: China far surpasses the West both in terms of the scale of the mausoleums and the burial objects. The mausoleum of Emperor Qin Shi Huang alone can compete with the sum total of all the imperial and royal tombs in European countries.
7. Killing Captives and Massacring Cities: This practice existed on a large scale in China for thousands of years, as documented in the historical records of all dynasties. Such practices in the West were sporadic.
8. Familial Fratricide: This practice existed on a large scale in the Chinese imperial and royal families for thousands of years, as documented in historical records of all dynasties. Familial fratricide in the West was infrequent.
9. Nine Kinship Exterminations: This practice existed in China on a large scale for thousands of years, as documented in historical records of all dynasties. Nine Kinship Exterminations never existed in the West.
10. Infanticide: This practice has existed in China on a large scale throughout history until today. In the West, infanticide existed in small numbers.

中华文明三千年，堪称伟大不朽的思想家凤毛麟角，墨子为荦荦大者，其兼爱即博爱论光照古今，即使放在世界思想界也毫不逊色。墨子思想在中国从来没有市场，不论是在学界还是在社会，因为曲高和寡，大大超前于世人的认知理解范畴，这更显其卓尔不群，崇高伟大。

Throughout the 3,000 years of Chinese civilization, the emergence of great and immortal thinkers has been a rare occurrence. Among them, Mozi stands out as a remarkable figure due to his doctrine of "inclusive love" or "universal love," which has remained a shining example through the ages. Even when compared to the philosophical traditions of the world, his contributions are recognized as brilliant achievements. Despite this, Mozi's ideas have never gained traction in China, neither in academia nor in society. This is largely due to the fact that his ideas are ahead of their time, exceeding the cognitive and interpretive categories of ordinary people. Nonetheless, it is precisely this uniqueness, greatness, and profound significance that sets Mozi apart from the rest.

两千多年来为项羽惋惜哀叹的不少，李清照的小诗更是推波助澜。实则项羽就是典型一蛮夫，黑猩猩的智商，豺狼虎豹的性情，动辄杀降屠城，双手沾满无辜者的鲜血，最后也是死有余辜。刘邦自是一标准流氓无赖，但客观上还是要比项羽强许多，这里的“强”是说他不那么嗜血凶残，不管出于什么动机或目的。中国历史改朝换代时分，常常是两个烂苹果里选一个，不是烂的赢，就是更烂的赢：刘邦对项羽、朱温对李存勖、朱元璋对陈友谅，李自成对多尔衮、洪秀全对曾国藩、蒋介石对毛泽东。

秦朝之后，在中国这片古老的土地上，再没有出过任何独立思想家，再没有言论自由，再没有书写自由，再没有出版自由，再没有摆脱因言获罪的恐惧。而秦朝建立于公元前221年，距今已有2200多年。

说什么历史悠久，说什么从无中断，然并卯！——Excuse my French

对于我个人来说，看历史不看什么丰功伟绩、千秋大业，而只看重，最看重人命。对于历史人物，手上鲜血少的，尤其是不滥杀无辜的，就是比杀人多的更值得敬重。此观念与许多人甚至大多数人不同。太平天国短短十余年，几千万上亿人就没了，至今谁在乎，不是歌颂洪秀全，就是崇拜曾国藩。在我眼里，这两个都不是好东西。